Watchmen Sequel Rumors
I'm not sure if I'm bothered by the idea of a Watchmen sequel type comic or not. Probably not, really, as I tend to share Diamondrock's take. It's good, but never seemed as legendary as I've seen other people say.
I suspect it's because I came into comics so late, when the medium's already pretty grim and gritty. I've never experienced (except through back issues) the superhero genre that Watchmen is deconstructing. Maybe that's why it's a bit lost on me.
I think a sequel's probably likely to suck though. Some universes are open and some are closed. DC and Marvel could take some event from thirty years ago in their main timelines and suddenly sequel it up no problem, because it suits that kind of storytelling. But Watchmen's self-contained and done. It'd feel weird to tack onto it.
And well, what about the characters? They're usually the reason for a sequel. But in this, the most interesting ones are dead (Rorschach), irredeemable (Ozymandias), or elsewhere (Manhattan). And the others are weak and complicit in a cover up.
I suppose after deconstructing 70s/80s comics, they could move onto deconstructing 90s/00s comics and bring everybody back. But...eh, seems like that's been done already.
I would be interested in some follow up vignettes for certain characters. A glimpse of what the world after Ozymandias's plan would actually be, but a full on sequel seems pretty pointless. IMO.
I suspect it's because I came into comics so late, when the medium's already pretty grim and gritty. I've never experienced (except through back issues) the superhero genre that Watchmen is deconstructing. Maybe that's why it's a bit lost on me.
I think a sequel's probably likely to suck though. Some universes are open and some are closed. DC and Marvel could take some event from thirty years ago in their main timelines and suddenly sequel it up no problem, because it suits that kind of storytelling. But Watchmen's self-contained and done. It'd feel weird to tack onto it.
And well, what about the characters? They're usually the reason for a sequel. But in this, the most interesting ones are dead (Rorschach), irredeemable (Ozymandias), or elsewhere (Manhattan). And the others are weak and complicit in a cover up.
I suppose after deconstructing 70s/80s comics, they could move onto deconstructing 90s/00s comics and bring everybody back. But...eh, seems like that's been done already.
I would be interested in some follow up vignettes for certain characters. A glimpse of what the world after Ozymandias's plan would actually be, but a full on sequel seems pretty pointless. IMO.
6 Comments:
At February 10, 2010 11:56 AM, Seangreyson said…
I could sort of see trying to work a sequel if it was written back then. But 30 years later just seems pointless.
Yeah there's the question of Rorschach's journal still floating out there, but what else do you have to work with.
At February 10, 2010 12:48 PM, Marshall Ryan Maresca said…
An actual sequel might-- MIGHT, mind you-- work if it wasn't as much a character sequel as it was a world sequel. What would the Watchmenverse look like in 2010? Does Ozymandias's "paradise" survive without him, or does it collapse? Do any new heroes step up to the plate? There's something potentially interesting to explore there.
At February 10, 2010 9:46 PM, captain koma said…
word mistake - its complicit not complacent. Also Watchmen 2 totally not.
At February 10, 2010 10:04 PM, kalinara said…
Nice catch. :-)
At February 11, 2010 12:41 AM, Tom Foss said…
I'd be interested to see the rampage Alan Moore would go on after this. I'm picturing full-on Red Lantern acid-blood-vomiting.
At December 16, 2011 7:21 AM, Junior said…
The guy is totally just, and there is no skepticism.
cool keychains | cheez | hair wraps
Post a Comment
<< Home